ModelPriceWatch.com
Last scan 2026-09-22 Models tracked 266 Providers 35 Cheapest paid Granite 4.0 H Micro $0.017/Mtok in Every price links to its source

Qwen3.7-Plus

by Together

Current budget open weights cheap tier

Today's price · per 1M tokens

Input

$0.320

per 1M tokens

Output

$1.28

per 1M tokens

Blended

$0.560

blended $/1M — 3:1 weighted input:output

Source: official Together pricing · read MODELPRICEWATCH.COM · 2026-09-22

Price receipt

We read Together's own pricing page on and found Qwen3.7-Plus listed with a price on the same row — that read is where the number above comes from. We keep the page text we read; its content hash is 0db20f21ed.

Qwen3.7-Plus is available on 3 hosts. See the full cheapest-first comparison on the consolidated Qwen3.7-Plus page →

Overview

Qwen3.7-Plus on Together. $0.32/$1.28 per 1M tokens.

Run it yourself

Deploy this open model on rented GPUs

Open weights mean you can self-host instead of paying per-token API prices. These platforms let you serve it on demand — often cheaper at scale.

Partner links — we may earn a commission if you sign up, at no cost to you. We only list platforms we'd recommend regardless.

Capabilities

struck through = not supported
Input 1/4
Text Image Audio Video
Output
Text
Features 2/9
Prompt caching Reasoning Coding Fast inference Long context Open weights Multimodal Web search Realtime

Benchmark performance

accuracy % · higher is better
Percentile vs all tracked models 69.8th3 independent measurements
Percentile per $/Mtok 124.6

We hold no per-benchmark accuracy scores for this model yet, so it has no accuracy average. That is a gap in our coverage, not a sign the model is untested — independent evaluators often publish a composite index for a new model long before releasing its per-benchmark numbers. The percentile above is its standing across the independent composites below.

Independent composite scores
  • AA Intelligence Index: 39 (Artificial Analysis composite across reasoning, knowledge and coding evals)
  • AA-Omniscience Index: 2.4 (−100–100)
  • LMSYS Chatbot Arena: 1459.4 ELO (Human preference)
How it stacks up
  • Ranks #33 of 181 comparably-measured models by percentile score, across 3 independent measurements
  • Ranks #20 of 181 comparably-tested models by normalized performance per dollar

Source: Artificial Analysis, LMSYS Chatbot Arena (UC Berkeley) · updated · See full rankings →

Specifications

Provider
Together
Context window
1M tokens
Modality
text
Parameters
Proprietary
Open source
Yes — open weights available
Released
Status
Current
Last updated
Tags
open-weightsbudget

Availability verified: listed on Together's own page