Hy-MT2 30B-A3B vs Hunyuan Hy3
Side-by-side comparison of API pricing, specs, benchmarks, and capabilities
Hy-MT2 30B-A3B is 49.8% cheaper on blended cost ($0.129 vs $0.257/Mtok)
| Specification |
by Tencent
|
by Tencent
|
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Status | Current budget Open weights | Current budget |
| Released | May 21, 2026 | Jul 7, 2026 |
| Pricing per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.074/Mtok | $0.147/Mtok |
| Output | $0.295/Mtok | $0.588/Mtok |
| Blended avg | $0.129/Mtok | $0.257/Mtok |
| Cached input | — | $0.037/Mtok |
| Price basis | Tencent's own price, quoted by the FP8 endpoint Tencent operates for this model. Tencent's RMB rate card carries the matching row at ¥0.5 in / ¥2 out per 1M tokens, which converts to these figures at 6.78 CNY/USD. That card names service tiers (Hy-MT2-Pro, Hy-MT2-Plus, Hy-MT2-Lite) rather than weight classes, and Pro and Plus share the same ¥0.5/¥2 row, so which tier this model is sold under is not stated on any Tencent page and is not claimed here. Tencent publishes no cached-input rate for this family. | USD is FX-derived from Tencent's RMB list price (¥1 / ¥0.25 / ¥4 per 1M) at 6.8031 CNY/USD (2026-07-07); re-checked on FX drift, not a promo. |
| Specifications | ||
| Context window | 8K tokens | 262K tokens |
| Parameters | 30B (A3B) | Proprietary |
| Speed (TPS) | — | — |
| Modalities | ||
| Input |
text
|
text
|
| Benchmarks sources: public leaderboards / Artificial Analysis, LMSYS Chatbot Arena (UC Berkeley), Tencent model card | ||
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.2 vendor |
| SWE-Bench Verified | — | 74.4 vendor |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 30 vendor |
| Independent composite scores each on its own scale — not part of the average above | ||
| AA Intelligence Index | — | 42.2 |
| AA Agentic Index | — | 31.4 |
| AA-Omniscience Index (−100–100) | — | -18.5 |
| LMSYS Chatbot Arena | — | 1412.2 ELO |
| Providers | ||
| Available from |
Tencent — $0.074/$0.295/Mtok
|
Tencent — $0.147/$0.588/Mtok
|
Cost at scale
1M tokens · 50/50 input/output| Volume | Hy-MT2 30B-A3B | Hunyuan Hy3 | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1M tokens | $0.13 | $0.26 | $0.13 (50.5%) |
| 10M tokens | $1.29 | $2.57 | $1.28 (49.8%) |
| 100M tokens | $12.92 | $25.73 | $12.8 (49.8%) |
| 1000M tokens | $129.25 | $257.25 | $128 (49.8%) |
When to pick which
distilled from the pricing and spec data above
Pick Hy-MT2 30B-A3B if…
- cost dominates: $0.129/Mtok blended vs $0.257 — 49.8% less on the same 50/50 token mix
- you want open weights — self-host it, fine-tune it, or exit the API entirely; Hunyuan Hy3 is closed
Pick Hunyuan Hy3 if…
- your workload re-reads context (agents, RAG, long chats): cached input costs $0.037/Mtok — 75% off its list input price, a discount Hy-MT2 30B-A3B doesn't offer
- you need the longer context: 262K tokens vs 8K (32×)
Summary
Hy-MT2 30B-A3B by Tencent costs $0.074/Mtok input and $0.295/Mtok output, with a 8K-token context window. It supports text input.
Hunyuan Hy3 by Tencent costs $0.147/Mtok input and $0.588/Mtok output, with a 262K-token context window. It supports text input.
On a blended cost basis, Hy-MT2 30B-A3B is 49.8% cheaper than Hunyuan Hy3.
Note: Pricing is per million tokens. Actual costs vary with usage patterns, prompt caching, and batch discounts. Always verify against official provider pricing pages.
More comparisons
pairs sharing a model with this page
GLM-4.7-Flash vs Ministral 3 3B
100% price gap
Solar Pro 4 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
94% price gap
Solar Pro 4 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash
92% price gap
Claude Fable 5 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
90% price gap
GPT-5.6 Terra vs GPT-5.6 Luna
90% price gap
Llama 3.3 70B vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
89% price gap
Llama 3.3 70B vs GPT-5.4
89% price gap
GPT-Realtime-2.1 mini vs GPT-Realtime-2.1
88% price gap