Muse Spark 1.1 vs Qwen3-Max
Side-by-side comparison of API pricing, specs, benchmarks, and capabilities
Muse Spark 1.1 is 16.7% cheaper on blended cost ($2.00 vs $2.40/Mtok)
| Specification |
Muse Spark 1.1Intro price
by Meta
|
by Alibaba
|
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Status | Current flagship | Current flagship |
| Released | Jul 9, 2026 | Jan 1, 2026 |
| Pricing per million tokens | ||
| Input | $1.25/Mtok | $1.20/Mtok |
| Output | $4.25/Mtok | $6.00/Mtok |
| Blended avg | $2.00/Mtok | $2.40/Mtok |
| Cached input | $0.150/Mtok | — |
| Specifications | ||
| Context window | 1M tokens | 262K tokens |
| Parameters | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Speed (TPS) | — | — |
| Modalities | ||
| Input |
textimagevideoaudio
|
text
|
| Benchmarks sources: Artificial Analysis / Alibaba model card | ||
| Independent composite scores measured for both models — each on its own scale | ||
| LMSYS Chatbot Arena | 1489.7 ELO | 1434.6 ELO |
| AA Intelligence Index | 50.6 | — |
| AA Agentic Index | 37.5 | — |
| AA-Omniscience Index (−100–100) | 18 | — |
| GDPval-AA v2 | 1375.1 ELO | — |
| Per-benchmark results published for Qwen3-Max only — no independent per-benchmark scores exist for Muse Spark 1.1 yet | ||
| GPQA Diamond | — | 70 vendor |
| SWE-Bench Verified | — | 48 vendor |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 25 vendor |
| ARC-AGI 2 | — | 28 vendor |
| AIME 2025 | — | 72 vendor |
| MMMLU | — | 80 vendor |
| BFCL | — | 70 vendor |
| HumanEval | — | 86 vendor |
| MATH 500 | — | 78 vendor |
| Providers | ||
| Available from |
Meta — $1.25/$4.25/Mtok
|
Alibaba — $1.20/$6.00/Mtok
|
Cost at scale
1M tokens · 50/50 input/output| Volume | Muse Spark 1.1 | Qwen3-Max | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1M tokens | $2 | $2.4 | $0.4 (16.7%) |
| 10M tokens | $20 | $24 | $4 (16.7%) |
| 100M tokens | $200 | $240 | $40 (16.7%) |
| 1000M tokens | $2000 | $2400 | $400 (16.7%) |
When to pick which
distilled from the pricing and spec data above
Pick Muse Spark 1.1 if…
- cost dominates: $2.00/Mtok blended vs $2.40 — 16.7% less on the same 50/50 token mix
- your workload re-reads context (agents, RAG, long chats): cached input costs $0.150/Mtok — 88% off its list input price, a discount Qwen3-Max doesn't offer
- you need the longer context: 1M tokens vs 262K (4×)
Pick Qwen3-Max if…
- this pairing gives Qwen3-Max no edge on price, context, cache discount, or measured performance — pick it only for qualitative fit (ecosystem, compliance, model behavior on your prompts)
Summary
Muse Spark 1.1 by Meta costs $1.25/Mtok input and $4.25/Mtok output, with a 1M-token context window. It supports text, image, video, audio input.
Qwen3-Max by Alibaba costs $1.20/Mtok input and $6.00/Mtok output, with a 262K-token context window. It supports text input.
On a blended cost basis, Muse Spark 1.1 is 16.7% cheaper than Qwen3-Max.It also has a larger context window.
Note: Pricing is per million tokens. Actual costs vary with usage patterns, prompt caching, and batch discounts. Always verify against official provider pricing pages.
More comparisons
pairs sharing a model with this page
Muse Spark 1.1 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6
67% price gap
Muse Spark 1.1 vs GPT-5.6 Terra
56% price gap
Muse Spark 1.1 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro
56% price gap
Inkling vs Muse Spark 1.1
12% price gap
GLM-5.2 vs Qwen3-Max
10% price gap
Gemini 3 Flash Preview vs Qwen3-Max
53% price gap
Gemini 3 Flash Preview vs Muse Spark 1.1
44% price gap
Grok 4.3 vs Qwen3-Max
35% price gap