Llama 3.1 8B vs Llama 4 Scout
Side-by-side API pricing comparison · Meta vs Meta
🏆
Llama 3.1 8B is 246.2% cheaper on blended cost ($0.065 vs $0.225/Mtok)
Llama 3.1 8B
by Meta
Current open weights Open weightsInput
$0.050/Mtok
Output
$0.080/Mtok
✓ Cheaper
| Blended avg | $0.065/Mtok |
|---|---|
| Context | 128K tokens |
| Modality | text |
| Parameters | 8B |
| Released | Jul 23, 2024 |
Llama 4 Scout
by Meta
Current open weights Open weightsInput
$0.110/Mtok
Output
$0.340/Mtok
| Blended avg | $0.225/Mtok |
|---|---|
| Context | 10M tokens |
| Modality | text, image |
| Parameters | 17B (16 experts) |
| Released | Apr 6, 2025 |
Cost at scale — 1M tokens (50/50 input/output)
| Volume | Llama 3.1 8B | Llama 4 Scout | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1M tokens | $0.07 | $0.23 | $0.16 (71.1%) |
| 10M tokens | $0.65 | $2.25 | $1.6 (71.1%) |
| 100M tokens | $6.5 | $22.5 | $16 (71.1%) |
| 1000M tokens | $65 | $225 | $160 (71.1%) |
Summary
Llama 3.1 8B by Meta costs $0.050/Mtok input and $0.080/Mtok output, with a 128K-token context window. It supports text input.
Llama 4 Scout by Meta costs $0.110/Mtok input and $0.340/Mtok output, with a 10M-token context window. It supports text, image input.
On a blended cost basis, Llama 3.1 8B is 246.2% cheaper than Llama 4 Scout.
Note: Pricing is per million tokens. Actual costs vary with usage patterns, prompt caching, and batch discounts. Always verify against official provider pricing pages.