Baichuan M2-32B vs Ministral 3 3B
Side-by-side API pricing comparison · Baichuan vs Mistral
🏆
Baichuan M2-32B is 42.9% cheaper on blended cost ($0.070 vs $0.100/Mtok)
Baichuan M2-32B
by Baichuan
Current budget Open weightsInput
$0.070/Mtok
Output
$0.070/Mtok
✓ Cheaper
| Blended avg | $0.070/Mtok |
|---|---|
| Context | 33K tokens |
| Modality | text |
| Parameters | 32B |
| Released | Jun 1, 2025 |
Ministral 3 3B
by Mistral
Current budget Open weightsInput
$0.100/Mtok
Output
$0.100/Mtok
| Blended avg | $0.100/Mtok |
|---|---|
| Context | 128K tokens |
| Modality | text |
| Parameters | 3B |
| Released | Sep 1, 2025 |
Cost at scale — 1M tokens (50/50 input/output)
| Volume | Baichuan M2-32B | Ministral 3 3B | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1M tokens | $0.07 | $0.1 | $0.03 (30%) |
| 10M tokens | $0.7 | $1 | $0.3 (30%) |
| 100M tokens | $7 | $10 | $3 (30%) |
| 1000M tokens | $70 | $100 | $30 (30%) |
Summary
Baichuan M2-32B by Baichuan costs $0.070/Mtok input and $0.070/Mtok output, with a 33K-token context window. It supports text input.
Ministral 3 3B by Mistral costs $0.100/Mtok input and $0.100/Mtok output, with a 128K-token context window. It supports text input.
On a blended cost basis, Baichuan M2-32B is 42.9% cheaper than Ministral 3 3B.
Note: Pricing is per million tokens. Actual costs vary with usage patterns, prompt caching, and batch discounts. Always verify against official provider pricing pages.