LIVE Cheapest: GLM-4.7-Flash $0/Mtok in 154 models tracked Updated Jul 1, 2026
Jul 1, 2026
ModelPriceWatch$/Mtok
Pricing / Compare / Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro

Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro

Side-by-side comparison of API pricing, specs, benchmarks, and capabilities

🏆 Gemini 2.5 Pro is 60% cheaper on blended cost ($5.63 vs $9.00/Mtok)
 
Overview
Status Current mid tier Current mid tier
Released Jan 15, 2026 Mar 1, 2025
Pricing per million tokens
Input $3.00/Mtok $1.25/Mtok
Output $15.00/Mtok $10.00/Mtok
Blended avg $9.00/Mtok $5.63/Mtok
Cached input $0.300/Mtok
Specifications
Context window 200K tokens 2M tokens
Parameters Proprietary Proprietary
Speed (TPS)
Modalities
Input
textimage
textimageaudiovideo
Benchmarks from Vellum LLM Leaderboard
Avg benchmark score 73.8 62.8
Perf / dollar 8.2 11.2
GPQA Diamond 68
SWE-Bench 50
HumanEval 87
MATH 500 80
Providers
Available from
Anthropic — $3.00/$15.00/Mtok
Google — $1.25/$10.00/Mtok

Cost at scale — 1M tokens (50/50 input/output)

VolumeClaude Sonnet 4.6Gemini 2.5 ProSavings
1M tokens $9 $5.63 $3.38 (37.6%)
10M tokens $90 $56.25 $33.75 (37.5%)
100M tokens $900 $562.5 $337.5 (37.5%)
1000M tokens $9000 $5625 $3375 (37.5%)

Summary

Claude Sonnet 4.6 by Anthropic costs $3.00/Mtok input and $15.00/Mtok output, with a 200K-token context window. It supports text, image input.

Gemini 2.5 Pro by Google costs $1.25/Mtok input and $10.00/Mtok output, with a 2M-token context window. It supports text, image, audio, video input.

On a blended cost basis, Gemini 2.5 Pro is 60% cheaper than Claude Sonnet 4.6. It also has a larger context window.

On benchmarks, Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores higher (73.8 vs 62.8) on average. In terms of value, Gemini 2.5 Pro has better performance per dollar (11.2 vs 8.2).

Note: Pricing is per million tokens. Actual costs vary with usage patterns, prompt caching, and batch discounts. Always verify against official provider pricing pages.