Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B vs GLM-5.2
Side-by-side comparison of API pricing, specs, benchmarks, and capabilities
| Specification |
by Alibaba
|
by Z.AI
3 providers:
Fireworks $1.40/$4.40
Together $1.40/$4.40
Z.AI $1.40/$4.40
|
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Status | Current open weights Open weights | Current flagship Open weights |
| Released | Aug 8, 2026 | Jun 13, 2026 |
| Pricing per million tokens | ||
| Input | $2.00/Mtok | $1.40/Mtok |
| Output | $6.00/Mtok | $4.40/Mtok |
| Blended avg | $3.00/Mtok | $2.15/Mtok |
| Cached input | — | $0.260/Mtok |
| Specifications | ||
| Context window | 1M tokens | 1M tokens |
| Parameters | 2.4T (A95B) | Proprietary |
| Speed (TPS) | — | — |
| Modalities | ||
| Input |
text
|
text
|
| Benchmarks sources: Artificial Analysis / Vellum LLM Leaderboard | ||
| Independent composite scores measured for both models — each on its own scale | ||
| AA Intelligence Index | 57.7 | 52.6 |
| AA Agentic Index | 57.1 | 45.7 |
| AA-Omniscience Index (−100–100) | 4.3 | 4.4 |
| GDPval-AA v2 | — | 1506.1 ELO |
| LMSYS Chatbot Arena | — | 1469.4 ELO |
| Per-benchmark results published for GLM-5.2 only — no independent per-benchmark scores exist for Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B yet | ||
| Avg benchmark score | — | 76 |
| Perf / dollar | — | 35.3 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 91.2 |
| SWE-Bench Verified | — | 45 vendor |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 | — | 81 |
| MCP Atlas | — | 77 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 54.7 |
| ARC-AGI 2 | — | 30 vendor |
| AIME 2025 | — | 70 vendor |
| MMMLU | — | 80 vendor |
| BFCL | — | 70 vendor |
| HumanEval | — | 84 vendor |
| MATH 500 | — | 76 vendor |
| AIME 2026 | — | 99.2 |
| Providers | ||
| Available from |
Alibaba — $2.00/$6.00/Mtok
|
Fireworks — $1.40/$4.40/Mtok
Together — $1.40/$4.40/Mtok
Z.AI — $1.40/$4.40/Mtok
|
Cost at scale
1M tokens · 50/50 input/output| Volume | Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B | GLM-5.2 | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1M tokens | $3 | $2.15 | $0.85 (28.3%) |
| 10M tokens | $30 | $21.5 | $8.5 (28.3%) |
| 100M tokens | $300 | $215 | $85 (28.3%) |
| 1000M tokens | $3000 | $2150 | $850 (28.3%) |
When to pick which
distilled from the pricing and spec data above- this pairing gives Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B no edge on price, context, cache discount, or measured performance — pick it only for qualitative fit (ecosystem, compliance, model behavior on your prompts)
- cost dominates: $2.15/Mtok blended vs $3.00 — 28.3% less on the same 50/50 token mix
- your workload re-reads context (agents, RAG, long chats): cached input costs $0.260/Mtok — 81% off its list input price, a discount Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B doesn't offer
- provider flexibility: available from 3 providers, so you can price-shop hosts or fail over
The cheaper option here — GLM-5.2 costs $2.15/Mtok blended on Z.AI.
Summary
Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B by Alibaba costs $2.00/Mtok input and $6.00/Mtok output, with a 1M-token context window. It supports text input.
GLM-5.2 by Z.AI costs $1.40/Mtok input and $4.40/Mtok output, with a 1M-token context window. It supports text input and is available from 3 providers.
On a blended cost basis, GLM-5.2 is 28.3% cheaper than Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B.
The two aren't directly comparable on average benchmark score: GLM-5.2 has published per-benchmark results, while Qwen3.8-2.4T-A95B does not yet — it is measured today on independent composites (see the table above).
Note: Pricing is per million tokens. Actual costs vary with usage patterns, prompt caching, and batch discounts. Always verify against official provider pricing pages.