GLM-OCR vs GLM-4-32B-0414
Side-by-side API pricing comparison · Zhipu vs Zhipu
🏆
GLM-OCR is 233.3% cheaper on blended cost ($0.030 vs $0.100/Mtok)
GLM-OCR
by Zhipu
Current budget Open weightsInput
$0.030/Mtok
Output
$0.030/Mtok
✓ Cheaper
| Blended avg | $0.030/Mtok |
|---|---|
| Context | 128K tokens |
| Modality | text, image |
| Parameters | Proprietary |
| Released | Jun 1, 2025 |
GLM-4-32B-0414
by Zhipu
Current budget Open weightsInput
$0.100/Mtok
Output
$0.100/Mtok
| Blended avg | $0.100/Mtok |
|---|---|
| Context | 128K tokens |
| Modality | text |
| Parameters | 32B |
| Released | Apr 1, 2025 |
Cost at scale — 1M tokens (50/50 input/output)
| Volume | GLM-OCR | GLM-4-32B-0414 | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1M tokens | $0.03 | $0.1 | $0.07 (70%) |
| 10M tokens | $0.3 | $1 | $0.7 (70%) |
| 100M tokens | $3 | $10 | $7 (70%) |
| 1000M tokens | $30 | $100 | $70 (70%) |
Summary
GLM-OCR by Zhipu costs $0.030/Mtok input and $0.030/Mtok output, with a 128K-token context window. It supports text, image input.
GLM-4-32B-0414 by Zhipu costs $0.100/Mtok input and $0.100/Mtok output, with a 128K-token context window. It supports text input.
On a blended cost basis, GLM-OCR is 233.3% cheaper than GLM-4-32B-0414.
Note: Pricing is per million tokens. Actual costs vary with usage patterns, prompt caching, and batch discounts. Always verify against official provider pricing pages.