Pixtral 12B vs Llama 4 Scout
Side-by-side API pricing comparison · Mistral vs Meta
🏆
Pixtral 12B is 125% cheaper on blended cost ($0.100 vs $0.225/Mtok)
Pixtral 12B
by Mistral
Current open weights Open weightsInput
$0.100/Mtok
Output
$0.100/Mtok
✓ Cheaper
| Blended avg | $0.100/Mtok |
|---|---|
| Context | 128K tokens |
| Modality | text, image |
| Parameters | 12B |
| Released | Nov 1, 2024 |
Llama 4 Scout
by Meta
Current open weights Open weightsInput
$0.110/Mtok
Output
$0.340/Mtok
| Blended avg | $0.225/Mtok |
|---|---|
| Context | 10M tokens |
| Modality | text, image |
| Parameters | 17B (16 experts) |
| Released | Apr 6, 2025 |
Cost at scale — 1M tokens (50/50 input/output)
| Volume | Pixtral 12B | Llama 4 Scout | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1M tokens | $0.1 | $0.23 | $0.13 (57.8%) |
| 10M tokens | $1 | $2.25 | $1.25 (55.6%) |
| 100M tokens | $10 | $22.5 | $12.5 (55.6%) |
| 1000M tokens | $100 | $225 | $125 (55.6%) |
Summary
Pixtral 12B by Mistral costs $0.100/Mtok input and $0.100/Mtok output, with a 128K-token context window. It supports text, image input.
Llama 4 Scout by Meta costs $0.110/Mtok input and $0.340/Mtok output, with a 10M-token context window. It supports text, image input.
On a blended cost basis, Pixtral 12B is 125% cheaper than Llama 4 Scout.
Note: Pricing is per million tokens. Actual costs vary with usage patterns, prompt caching, and batch discounts. Always verify against official provider pricing pages.